• 专利附录
  • 专利说明
  • 权利要求
  • 类似技术
  • 同族专利
  • 引用文献
  • 法律状态
  • 优先权
    • 专利摘要:
    A method for allocating radio resources for establishing satellite communications in a first communications system comprising a constellation of traveling satellites (SAT_NGSO1, SAT_NGSO2) and a first set of terminals (TER_NGSO1, TER_NGSO2), the method comprising the following steps for each terminal (TER_NGSO1, TER_NGSO2) of the first set: - determining a distinct separation angle threshold to be respected with respect to a geostationary satellite constellation (SAT_GSO), a separation angle being defined as weakest topocentric angle under which a passing satellite (SAT_NGSO1, SAT_NGSO2) and any geostationary satellite (SAT_GSO) of the geostationary arc are seen from a given terminal (TER_NGSO1, TER_NGSO2) of the first set, - allow the terminal ( TER_NGSO1, TER_NGSO2) to establish a communication link with a moving satellite (SAT_NGSO1, SAT_NGSO2) if the angle of separation (αt 11, αt22) associated with said link is greater than or equal to the separation angle threshold.
    公开号:FR3045989A1
    申请号:FR1502640
    申请日:2015-12-18
    公开日:2017-06-23
    发明作者:Zakariya Faraj；Nicolas Chuberre
    申请人:Thales SA；
    IPC主号:
    专利说明:

    (1) où:
    Na est le nombre de terminaux du premier système de communication visibles depuis un satellite géostationnaire (sur la figure 5a, un seul terminal TER_NGSO est représenté) i est l’indice du terminal considéré appartenant au premier système de communication,
    Pi est la puissance RF en entrée de l'antenne du terminal TER_NGSO considéré appartenant au premier système de communication (dBW),
    G,(<pu) est le gain de l'antenne d’émission du terminal TER_NGSO considéré appartenant au premier système de communication en direction d’un satellite géostationnaire SAT_GSO,
    Gr(p2,)e8t le gain de l'antenne de réception d’un satellite géostationnaire SAT_GSO en direction du ième terminal considéré du premier système de communication TER_NGSO,
    Grtmx est le gain maximum de l'antenne d’un satellite géostationnaire SAT_GSO, (pu est l’angle entre l'axe de visée du terminal TER_NGSO considéré (indice i) appartenant au premier système de communication et la direction entre le terminal TER_NGSO et un satellite géostationnaire SAT_GSO (angle représenté sur la figure 5a), q>2i est l’angle entre l'axe de visée d’un satellite géostationnaire SAT_GSO et la direction entre ce satellite SAT_GSO et le ieme terminal TER_NGSO considéré du premier système de communication (angle représenté sur la figure 5a),
    Ri est la distance entre le terminal TER_NGSO considéré du premier système de communication et le satellite géostationnaire SAT_GSO.
    Le calcul de La puissance surfacique équivalente epfd_up pour les liaisons montantes est réalisé pour tous les points de l’arc géostationnaire avec un échantillonnage approprié. La direction de pointage du satellite géostationnaire SAT_GSO, autrement dit la valeur de l’angle 92, est choisie de sorte à maximiser la valeur du niveau d’interférence epfd_up. La direction de pointage du terminal du premier système TER_NGSO, autrement dit la valeur de l’angle <pij, est donnée par la direction entre ce terminal TER_NGSO et le satellite SAT_NGSO sélectionné à l’étape 403 (satellite qui permet de minimiser l’angle de séparation).
    La valeur du seuil d’angle de séparation a une influence à la fois sur l’angle tpi, et sur l’angle φ2, puisque cette valeur définit l’éloignement relatif du satellite défilant SAT_NGSO par rapport au satellite géostationnaire SAT_GSO. En conséquence, la valeur du seuil d’angle de séparation a une influence sur le gain de l'antenne de réception d’un satellite géostationnaire SAT_GSO dans la direction de visée du terminal TER_NGSO du premier système et sur le gain de l’antenne d’émission du terminal TER_NGSO du premier système dans la direction de visée du satellite géostationnaire SAT_GSO.
    La figure 5b représente, sur un schéma, deux terminaux TER_NGS01 ,TER_NGS02 et un satellite SAT_NGSO du premier système de communications ainsi qu’un terminal TER_GSO et un satellite SAT_GSO d’un système géostationnaire. Le paragraphe suivant explicite un exemple de calcul 405 de la puissance surfacique équivalente epfd_down calculée pour les interférences produites par les émissions du satellite SAT_NGSO vers le terminal TER_GSO du système géostationnaire.
    De la même façon, pour chaque terminal TER_GSO placé sur un point de la surface de la terre, la puissance surfacique équivalente epfd_down pour les liaisons descendantes (second calcul de niveau d’interférence 405) peut être calculée par l’intermédiaire de la relation (2), identique à la relation (1 ) mais appliquée aux variables suivantes :
    (2)
    Nb est le nombre de satellites de la première constellation visibles depuis un terminal appartenant au système géostationnaire (sur la figure 5b, on a représenté, à titre purement illustratif, un seul satellite SAT_NGSO), P’, est la puissance RF en entrée de l'antenne du satellite SAT_NGSO considéré appartenant à la première constellation (dBW),
    G (φι ) est le gain de l'antenne d’émission du satellite SAT_NGSO considéré appartenant à la première constellation en direction d’un terminal TER_GSO appartenant au système géostationnaire, G(<p'2i)est le gain de l'antenne de réception d’un terminal TER_GSO appartenant au système géostationnaire en direction du ième satellite SAT_NGSO considéré de la première constellation, G'rmaxest le gain maximum de l'antenne d’un terminal TER_GSO du système géostationnaire, <p’ii est l’angle entre l'axe de visée du satellite SAT_NGSO considéré (indice i) appartenant à la première constellation et la direction entre ce satellite SAT_NGSO et un terminal TER_GSO appartenant au système géostationnaire (angle représenté sur la figure 5b), φ’21 est l’angle entre l'axe de visée d’un terminal TER_GSO appartenant au système géostationnaire et la direction entre ce terminal TER_GSO et le ième satellite SAT_NGSO considéré de la première constellation (angle représenté sur la figure 5b), R’i est la distance entre le satellite SAT_NGSO considéré de la première constellation et le terminal TER_GSO du système géostationnaire.
    La relation (2) est appliquée pour un ensemble de positions supposées de terminaux d'un système géostationnaire selon un maillage prédéfini et approprié de la surface de la Terre. La direction de pointage du terminal TER_GSO appartenant au système géostationnaire, autrement dit la valeur de l’angle φ’2ΐ est choisie de sorte à maximiser la valeur du niveau d’interférence epfd_down. La direction de pointage du satellite SAT_NGSO, autrement dit la valeur de l’angle φ’ϋ, est la direction de pointage du satellite SAT_NGSO sélectionné à l’étape 403 (satellite qui permet de minimiser l’angle de séparation) vers le terminal TER_NGSO considéré.
    La valeur du seuil d’angle de séparation a une influence à la fois sur l’angle φ’-π et sur l’angle φ’2ι puisque cette valeur définit l’éloignement relatif du satellite défilant SATJMGSO par rapport au satellite géostationnaire SAT_GSO. En conséquence, la valeur du seuil d’angle de séparation a une influence sur le gain de l'antenne de réception d’un terminal TER_GSO appartenant au système géostationnaire dans la direction de visée du satellite SAT_NGSO du premier système et sur le gain de l’antenne d’émission du satellite SAT_NGSO du premier système dans la direction de visée du terminal TER_GSO.
    La méthode se poursuit avec l’application d’une étape 406 consistant en un test de conformité des niveaux d’interférences calculés aux étapes 404 et 405 avec des limites spécifiées réglementairement, par exemple par l’Union Internationale des Télécommunications.
    Dans l’étape 406, on applique un premier test de conformité pour les liaisons montantes consistant à comparer le premier niveau d’interférences global Epfd_up avec une première limite réglementaire. De même, on applique un second test de conformité pour les liaisons descendantes consistant à comparer le second niveau d’interférences global Epfd_down avec une seconde limite réglementaire.
    Les tests de conformité de l’étape 406 peuvent consister plus généralement à évaluer si le premier niveau d’interférences global Epfd_up et le second niveau d’interférences global Epfd_down sont acceptables ou non du point de vue du fonctionnement des systèmes géostationnaires.
    Si les deux tests de conformité réalisés à l’étape 406 sont conformes, autrement dit si les deux niveaux d’interférences globaux sont chacun inférieurs aux limites réglementaires sur tout l’arc géostationnaire et pour toutes les hypothèses de positions de terminaux d’un système géostationnaire, alors la méthode se poursuit avec une étape 407 qui consiste à diminuer, d’une valeur prédéterminée, la valeur du seuil d’angle de séparation pour chaque terminal candidat à l’abaissement de son seuil. A la suite de l’étape 407, la méthode redémarre à l’étape 403 pour une nouvelle itération. L’abaissement du seuil d’angle de séparation est ici possible car le niveau global d’interférences généré en fixant le seuil d’angle de séparation à la valeur initiale établie à la première étape 401, ne dépasse pas les limites réglementaires.
    Si au contraire, l’un des deux tests de conformité réalisés à l’étape 406 n’est pas conforme, la méthode se poursuit avec les étapes 408 et/ou 409.
    Si le premier test de conformité, concernant les liaisons montantes, n’est pas conforme, autrement dit si le premier niveau d’interférences global Epfd_up est supérieur au premier seuil réglementaire pour au moins un point de l’arc géostationnaire, la méthode se poursuit avec une étape 408 qui consiste à identifier les satellites géostationnaires, autrement dit les points de l’arc géostationnaire, qui subissent un niveau d’interférences non conforme.
    Si le second test de conformité, concernant les liaisons descendantes, n’est pas conforme, autrement dit si le second niveau d’interférences global Epfd_down est supérieur au second seuil réglementaire pour au moins une position supposée d’un terminal d’un système géostationnaire, la méthode se poursuit avec une étape 409 qui consiste à identifier les terminaux des systèmes géostationnaires, autrement dit les points du maillage de la Terre, qui subissent un niveau d’interférences non conforme.
    La méthode se poursuit avec l’étape 410 dans laquelle, pour chaque non-conformité relevée, on identifie les couples (terminal, satellite) du premier système (tels que créés à l’issue de l’étape 403) dont la contribution, dans le calcul d’interférences global, est la plus élevée. Cette recherche est effectuée indépendamment pour le calcul de niveau d’interférences associé aux liaisons montantes epfd_up et pour le calcul de niveau d’interférences associé aux liaisons descendantes epfd_down. Cette recherche peut se faire en évaluant séparément les termes des sommes mises en jeu dans les relations (1) et (2), autrement dit les niveaux d’interférences calculés pour chacun des Na terminaux (pour les liaisons montantes) ou chacun des Nb satellites (pour les liaisons descendantes) et en recherchant les couples (terminal, satellite) qui produisent le niveau d’interférences le plus élevé pour chacun des deux tests de conformité. A l’issue de l’étape 410, on obtient donc une liste de terminaux du premier système qui présentent un seuil d’angle de séparation qui engendre, un niveau d’interférences non réglementaire sur les systèmes géostationnaires.
    Dans une étape 411, pour chaque terminal de la liste identifiée à l’étape 410, on rétablit la valeur du seuil d’angle de séparation à la valeur fixée à l’itération précédente puis on retire le terminal de la liste des terminaux candidats à l’abaissement de leur seuil d’angle de séparation.
    Dans une étape 412, on contrôle si la liste des terminaux candidats à l’abaissement de leur seuil d’angle de séparation est vide, si oui on passe à l’étape 413 qui consiste à mettre à jour, pour chaque terminal, la valeur du seuil d'angle de séparation à la dernière valeur fixée.
    Si cette liste 412 n’est pas vide, alors la méthode retourne à l’étape 403 pour une nouvelle itération.
    Selon une variante du premier mode de réalisation de l’invention tel que décrit à la figure 4, l’étape 411 est modifiée pour prendre en compte des cas de figure où, lorsque l’on rétablit un seuil d’angle de séparation à sa valeur à l’itération précédente, on arrive à une situation où le terminal considéré ne peut plus communiquer avec aucun satellite sans enfreindre ce seuil. Autrement dit, aucun satellite n’est compatible de la valeur du seuil d’angle de séparation pour le terminal considéré.
    Pour prendre en compte cette possibilité, l’étape 411 est modifiée de la façon suivante. Pour chaque terminal de la liste identifiée à l’étape 410, on rétablit la valeur du seuil d’angle de séparation à la valeur fixée à l’itération précédente si au moins un satellite est accessible, pour ce terminal, avec l’ancienne valeur.
    Dans le cas contraire, la valeur du seuil d’angle de séparation est maintenue et le niveau d’interférences global du système est abaissé en adaptant les caractéristiques RF des liaisons impliquant le terminal et un satellite du système. L’adaptation peut concerner la densité de puissance du signal émis par le terminal (liaison montante) ou du signal émis par le satellite (liaison descendante). L’adaptation peut également concerner le type d'antenne du satellite et/ou la fréquence des signaux échangés et/ou la polarisation de ces signaux. L’étape 411 se termine dans tous les cas par le retrait du terminal de la liste des terminaux candidats à l’abaissement de leur seuil d’angle de séparation.
    Dans un deuxième mode de réalisation, selon l’invention, de la méthode de détermination dynamique d’un seuil d’angle de séparation pour chaque terminal, exécutée à l’étape 207, les liaisons montantes et les liaisons descendantes sont considérées indépendantes. Autrement dit, un même terminal peut communiquer avec un premier satellite selon une liaison montante et avec un second satellite selon une liaison descendante. Dans ce deuxième exemple, on considère séparément un premier seuil d’angle de séparation pour les liaisons montantes et un second seuil d’angle de séparation pour les liaisons descendantes.
    La méthode décrite à la figure 4 est alors appliquée indépendamment pour les liaisons montantes et pour les liaisons descendantes. On a représenté les étapes de la méthode selon le deuxième mode de réalisation appliqué aux liaisons montantes sur la figure 6 et appliqué aux liaisons descendantes sur la figure 7.
    La méthode décrite à la figure 6 pour les liaisons unidirectionnelles montantes est identique à celle décrite à la figure 4 pour les liaisons bidirectionnelles à l'exception du fait que les étapes 405 et 409, qui concernent le calcul d’interférences générées par les liaisons descendantes, sont supprimées.
    La méthode décrite à la figure 7 pour les liaisons unidirectionnelles descendantes est identique à celle décrite à la figure 4 pour les liaisons bidirectionnelles à l’exception du fait que les étapes 404 et 408, qui concernent le calcul d’interférences générées par les liaisons montantes, sont supprimées.
    Les deux exemples de réalisation de la méthode, selon l’invention, de détermination dynamique d’un seuil d’angle de séparation tels que décrits à l’appui de l’algorithme de la figure 4 sont donnés à titre illustratifs. Sans sortir du cadre de l’invention, la méthode peut être mise en œuvre par le biais d’autres implémentations. En particulier, le traitement itératif décrit à la figure 4 peut être remplacé par un algorithme consistant à calculer les niveaux d’interférence globaux Epfd_up,Epfd_down pour plusieurs seuils d’angles de séparation, pris dans une plage de variation. Par exemple, on peut calculer les niveaux d’interférences globaux pour des seuils d’angles de séparation variant de 2° à 7° par pas de 0,5°. L’ensemble des résultats de calcul est sauvegardé en mémoire puis une optimisation paramétrique est réalisée pour déterminer, pour chaque terminal actif, le seuil d’angle de séparation qui permet d’obtenir le niveau d’interférences global le plus faible ou qui permet d’obtenir un niveau d’interférences global respectant le seuil réglementaire.
    TECHNICAL FIELD The invention relates to the field of satellite communications systems and in particular systems using traveling satellites, for example satellites in low orbit or "low earth orbit" in English. The invention relates to a method for allocating radio resources in a scrolling satellite communications system operating in frequency bands reserved for geostationary systems. The invention relates to taking into account, in the radio resource allocation method, the level of interference generated by the traveling-satellite system towards any communications system using geostationary satellites.
    The satellite radio regulations permit the deployment of non-geostationary systems in frequency bands previously reserved for geostationary-satellite based systems.
    However, the coexistence of two satellite communications systems using all or part of the same frequency bands poses a problem in managing the interference generated by one system to another. In this case, the geostationary system is likely to be disturbed, or even jammed, by transmissions between satellites and ground stations belonging to the non-geostationary system.
    To ensure a given quality of service for a geostationary communications system, the International Telecommunication Union (ITU or ITU) has set a maximum permitted level of interference impacting the overall geostationary telecommunications systems from coexisting systems. on the same frequency bands and using non-geostationary satellites.
    In order to ensure that a non-geostationary system does not generate an interference level higher than the authorized threshold, one solution consists in fixing, for all the links between the ground terminals and the non-geostationary satellites, an angle threshold. of separation from the geostationary arc. The geostationary arc refers to the view of the geostationary orbit from Earth.
    A non-geostationary system terminal is authorized to establish a communication link (upstream, downstream or bidirectional) with a non-geostationary satellite if and only if its separation angle is less than the fixed separation angle threshold and independently of other links established by the other terminals. Thus, each terminal sees the number of non-geostationary satellites with which it can potentially communicate reduce. In particular, non-geostationary systems can use Ka-band spectral resources and the terminals of these systems can operate at very low elevation angles. Such conditions lead to the requirement of using very large transmission powers. Such power levels then require the use of a high value separation angle so as not to interfere with the co-existing geostationary systems on the same Ka band. Typically, a separation angle threshold value of the order of 7 degrees is used to satisfy all of these constraints. Unfortunately, the use of a separation angle with a fixed and high value has the consequence that the geographical coverage provided by the non-geostationary system is diminished.
    A simple solution to ensure a sufficient level of service and geographical coverage for the non-geostationary system while respecting the recommended separation angle threshold, is to increase the number of non-geostationary satellites in the system constellation. Thus, it ensures an average number of available satellites for each terminal while prohibiting terminal-satellite links that are not compatible with the separation angle threshold.
    However, the increase in the number of non-geostationary satellites has disadvantages of additional costs for the design of the overall system and also of sub-optimality because all the available communication resources are not fully utilized because of the related obstacle. coexistence with geostationary systems.
    A static method described in US patent application 2003/0073404 A1 proposes to avoid alignments of the radio frequency earth / space links between a new non-geostationary system (system B) and other existing geostationary systems (A systems) sharing the same frequency band.
    This process is based on the consideration of predictive constraints such as satellite orbits and the radio-frequency characteristics of stations and satellites of systems A and B.
    This static method is valid for systems operating in low frequency bands such as the Ku band. In fact, for this type of system, the geometrical aspect alone makes it possible to plan statistically and deterministically the radio frequency earth / space links to be used by the system B without causing interference with the other existing A systems and any ensuring the expected quality of service for System B.
    This strategy is justified when the atmospheric attenuations are negligible (which is the case of systems operating in low frequency bands).
    This static method is no longer appropriate for a new system B operating in high frequency bands such as the Ka band. In fact, the use of low elevations combined with significant atmospheric attenuations, such as those induced by rain, imposes an excessive oversizing in terms of the power required at the edge and the ground level of the infrastructure of the system B in order to ensure the expected quality of service.
    A variant of the above method consists in imposing that the earth-space radio-frequency links of the new system B can only be implemented when the satellites of the system B are seen by the stations of the system B with a high angle of elevation. . This makes it possible to reduce the dynamics of atmospheric attenuations even in high frequency bands such as the Ka band. Nevertheless, this strategy imposes an oversizing in terms of number of satellites to be deployed by the system B to ensure the visibility rate required by the latter. This over-sizing has a strong impact on the cost and deployment of B-system ground and edge infrastructures.
    The present invention proposes to overcome the aforementioned drawbacks by a method of allocation of radio resources, in a system of scrolling satellite communications, which defines, in a dynamic manner, a separation angle threshold to be respected for each terminal as a function of a global level of interference generated towards geostationary systems. The invention makes it possible to maximize the geographical coverage by minimizing the number of satellites in the non-geostationary system constellation while ensuring that the level of interference induced to geostationary systems using totally or partially identical frequency bands does not exceed the threshold. regulatory. The subject of the invention is a method for allocating radio resources for restoring satellite communications in a first communications system comprising a constellation of traveling satellites and a first set of terminals, the method comprising the following steps for each terminal of the first set: - to determine a distinct separation angle threshold to be respected with respect to a geostationary satellite constellation, a separation angle being defined as the lowest topocentric angle under which a given traveling satellite and any geostationary satellite of the geostationary arc are seen from a given terminal of the first set, - allow the terminal to establish a communication link with a traveling satellite if the separation angle associated with said link is greater than or equal to the threshold of separation angle.
    According to one particular aspect of the invention, the distinct separation angle threshold to be respected for each terminal of the first set is determined so that all the authorized communications links generate, on a satellite communications system. geostationaries, an interfering power level that complies with a regulatory limit.
    According to a particular aspect of the invention, the determination of a separation angle threshold comprises: the calculation of at least one interfering power level generated by all the communication links between the terminals of the first set and the traveling satellites (towards a geostationary satellite communications system; - the iterative search, for each terminal of the first set, of the minimum value of the separation angle threshold making it possible to maintain said at least one interfering power level calculated in accordance with a regulatory limit.
    According to a particular aspect of the invention, the determination of a separation angle threshold comprises an initialization phase of assigning an initial value to the separation angle threshold for each terminal and declaring each candidate terminal lowering its separation angle threshold.
    According to a particular aspect of the invention, said iterative search comprises, for each terminal and at each iteration, the association of said terminal with a traveling satellite respecting the separation angle threshold determined at the current iteration and for which the separation angle is closest to said threshold, the iterations being continued as long as at least one terminal is a candidate for lowering its separation angle threshold.
    According to one particular aspect of the invention, the communication links between the terminals of the first set and the traveling satellites are bidirectional or unidirectional up and said iterative search comprises the calculation of a first interfering power level generated by all the links. of upward communications to the geostationary arc for a set of assumed positions of geostationary satellites.
    According to a particular aspect of the invention, the calculation of said first interfering power level is determined by selecting, for each geostationary satellite, a pointing direction which makes it possible to maximize the value of said first interfering power level.
    According to a particular aspect of the invention, said iterative search includes the search for at least one geostationary satellite for which the first level of interfering power calculated does not comply with said regulatory limit.
    According to a particular aspect of the invention, the communication links between the terminals of the first set and the traveling satellites are unidirectional downward and said iterative search comprises the calculation of a second interfering power level generated by the set of communication links. down to a set of assumed positions of terminals belonging to a geostationary satellite communications system.
    According to one particular aspect of the invention, the communication links between the terminals of the first set and the traveling satellites are bidirectional and said iterative search comprises the calculation of a second interfering power level generated by the set of downlink communication links. to a set of assumed positions of terminals belonging to a geostationary satellite communications system.
    According to a particular aspect of the invention, the calculation of said second interfering power level is determined by selecting, for each terminal belonging to a geostationary satellite communications system, a pointing direction which makes it possible to maximize the value of said second power level. interfering.
    According to a particular aspect of the invention, said iterative search comprises the search for at least one terminal belonging to a geostationary satellite communications system for which the second level of interfering power calculated does not comply with said regulatory threshold.
    According to one particular aspect of the invention, said iterative search comprises, for each first or second interfering power level calculated that is not in accordance with said regulatory threshold, the search for at least one pair (terminal of the first set, traveling satellite) whose contribution in the value of the first or second interfering power level is the highest.
    According to a particular aspect of the invention, said iterative search comprises, for each terminal of the couple (terminal of the first set, scrolling satellite) selected, the reestablishment of the separation angle threshold determined at the previous iteration and the withdrawal of said terminal from the list of candidates for the lowering of the separation angle threshold.
    According to a particular aspect of the invention, said iterative search comprises, for at least one terminal of the couple (terminal of the first set, scrolling satellite) selected, the adaptation of the RF characteristics of at least one link involving said terminal and a passing satellite. so as to reduce the interfering power level of all the authorized communications links on a geostationary satellite communications system.
    According to a particular aspect of the invention, the iterative search comprises a check of the conformity of the first interfering power level and / or the second interfering power level and, if the compliance is verified, the lowering of the separating a predetermined value for each candidate terminal to lower its separation angle threshold.
    According to a particular aspect of the invention the iterative search is stopped when no terminal is no longer candidate for the lowering of its separation angle threshold. The invention also relates to a radio resource allocation device for the establishment of satellite communications comprising means, including at least one processor and a memory, configured to implement the method of allocation of radio resources according to the invention. The invention also relates to a computer program comprising instructions for the execution of the radio resource allocation method for establishing satellite communications according to the invention, when the program is executed by a processor. The subject of the invention is also a recording medium readable by a processor on which is recorded a program comprising instructions for executing the method for allocating radio resources for restoring satellite communications according to the invention, when the program is executed by a processor. Other characteristics and advantages of the present invention will appear better on reading the description which follows in relation to the appended drawings which represent: FIG. 1, a block diagram showing the context of application of the invention, FIG. a flowchart detailing the steps of a method of designing a non-geostationary satellite communications system according to the invention; - Figure 3 is a flowchart detailing the steps of a radio resource allocation method according to the FIG. 4 is a flowchart detailing the steps of a function for dynamically determining a separation angle threshold, according to a first embodiment of the invention; FIG. 5a, a diagram illustrating an example; for calculating global interference relating to the upstream channels; - FIG. 5b, a diagram illustrating an example of global interference calculation relating to the downstream channels; and FIG. 6, an organigra even detailing the steps of a function for dynamically determining a separation angle threshold, according to a second embodiment of the invention applied to uplinks, - Figure 7, a flowchart detailing the steps of a function. dynamic determination of a separation angle threshold, according to a second embodiment of the invention applied to downlinks.
    Figure 1 schematically illustrates an exemplary application scenario of the invention comprising a first scrolling satellite communications system and a second satellite communications system which is a geostationary system. The first communications system comprises a plurality of satellites SAT_NGS01, SAT_NGS02 and a set of ground terminals TER_NGS01, TER_NGS02. The terminals can be fixed or mobile and are able to communicate with each satellite of the system according to an uplink or a downlink or a bidirectional link LR1.LR2. Similarly, the second geostationary communications system comprises a plurality of geostationary satellites and a set of terminals. For simplicity, in FIG. 1 only a satellite SAT_GSO and a terminal TER_GSO constituting the second communications system and communicating with each other via a LRGEO satellite link are represented.
    A terminal may be any network equipment capable of exchanging and communicating over a wireless link with a satellite. It may be in particular a fixed or portable computer, a fixed or portable telephone, a personal digital assistant, a server or a satellite access modem.
    The first satellite communications system and the second satellite communications system are capable of establishing communications in totally or partially identical frequency bands. An example of a band of frequencies used is the band Ka. Another example is the Ku band.
    The first satellite communications system further includes an ST_RRM satellite station comprising a control subsystem for managing the allocation of communication resources within the system. The present invention can be implemented in the control subsystem. The invention can be implemented from hardware and / or software elements. It can in particular be implemented as a computer program including instructions for its execution. The computer program can be recorded on a processor-readable recording medium. The support can be electronic, magnetic, optical or electromagnetic. The invention can also be implemented by a device of the control subsystem type embedded in a satellite station, the device comprising a processor and a memory. The processor may be a generic processor, a specific processor, an application-specific integrated circuit (also known as ASIC for "Application-
    Specifies Integrated Circuit ") or an in-situ programmable gate array (also known as FPGA for" Field-Programmable Gate Array ").
    The device can use one or more dedicated electronic circuits or a general purpose circuit. The technique of the invention can be realized on a reprogrammable calculation machine (a processor or a microcontroller for example) executing a program comprising a sequence of instructions, or on a dedicated calculation machine (for example a set of logic gates). as an FPGA or an ASIC, or any other hardware module). As an example of hardware architecture adapted to implement the invention, a device according to the invention may comprise a communication bus which is connected to a central processing unit or microprocessor (CPU, acronym for "Central Processing Unit" in English), a read only memory (ROM, acronym for "Read Only Memory" in English) that may include the programs necessary for the implementation of the invention; a random access memory or RAM (Random Access Memory) with registers adapted to record variables and parameters created and modified during the execution of the aforementioned programs; and a communication interface or I / O (I / O acronym for "Input / ouput" in English) adapted to transmit and receive data.
    We now introduce a definition of an angle, which is identified in Figure 1. This angle is used later to explain the embodiments of the invention.
    We consider an angle at hereinafter referred to as a topocentric angle. As a reminder, a topocentric angle is an angle under which two given points are seen from a specific point of the Earth. The particular topocentric angle considered in the context of the invention is an angle formed by the direction between a terminal and a satellite of the first system and the direction between the same terminal and a satellite of the geostationary system. In FIG. 1, the topocentric angle ati1 associated with the terminal TER_NGS01 and with the satellites SAT_NGS01, SAT_GSO, is represented by way of example. The topocentric angle at22 associated with the terminal TER_NGS02 and with the satellites SAT_NGS02, SAT_GS0 is also represented.
    We also define the notion of separation angle, for a connection between a terminal of the first system TER_NGS01, TER_NGS02 and a moving satellite of the first system SAT_NGS01, SAT_NGS02 as being the lowest topocentric angle by varying the position of a geostationary satellite on all possible points of the geostationary arc.
    In other words, the separation angle is defined as the minimum angle under which a satellite traveling in the first constellation and any geostationary satellite are seen from a terminal of the first communications system.
    This angle defines the proximity between the link connecting a terminal of the first system with a moving satellite of the first constellation and the geostationary satellites. The lower this angle, the more likely it is that this link interferes with geostationary satellites but also with the ground terminals of geostationary systems. In particular, the interference generated on the geostationary satellites comes from the signal transmitted by a terminal of the first constellation to space, in other words on the Earth-to-space uplink. FIG. 1 diagrammatically shows the INT_M_1 interferences generated by the terminal TER_NGS01 on the geostationary satellite SAT_GSO as well as the interferences INT_M_2 generated by the terminal TER_NGS02 on the geostationary satellite SAT_GSO.
    Likewise, the interference generated on the TER_GSO ground terminals belonging to geostationary systems comes from the signal transmitted by a satellite traveling from the first communications system, in other words from the space-to-Earth downlink. In FIG. 1, the INT_D_1 interferences generated by the satellite SAT_NGS01 towards the terminal TER_GSO of the geostationary system as well as the interferences INT_D_2 generated by the satellite SAT_NGS02 towards this same terminal TER_GSO have also been identified.
    As indicated in the preamble, a solution allowing to respect a level of regulatory interference consists in setting a threshold for this angle of separation, for example a threshold equal to 7 °, below which, the link between a terminal and a satellite of the first The system is then forbidden to select another satellite for establishing a link with the terminal, so as to respect a separation angle greater than the threshold set.
    It should be noted that the term "separation angle" can also be replaced by "avoidance angle" in French or "avoidance angle" or "separation angle" in English. The invention proposes a method for dynamic configuration of the thresholds applied to the separation angles to improve the allocation of communication resources available within the first communications system while ensuring compliance with the level of regulatory interference generated on the communications systems. by geostationary satellites.
    FIG. 2 schematizes a flowchart detailing the steps of a method of designing a satellite communications system according to the invention. This method has the overall function of static management of radio resources of the system. Such a function is usually referred to as "static radio resources management".
    In a first step 201, a satellite operator provides a request for requirements of a communications system that includes needs for quality of service, overall availability, overall bit rate, error rate or other general operating characteristics of such a system. system.
    In a second step 202, the impact of local atmospheric conditions for each terminal likely to be integrated into the system is evaluated. This evaluation can be done by characterizing the attenuation level of the signal received or transmitted by a terminal as a function of the elevation of the terminal.
    In a third step 203, a link budget calculation is performed for both uplinks and downlinks of the system. The calculation of the link budget notably takes as input parameter the maximum level of attenuation as a function of the elevation for each terminal. For the uplink, the link budget can be evaluated by calculating the equivalent isotropically radiated power (EIRP) required at the terminal. For the downlink, the link budget can be evaluated by a calculation of the signal-to-noise ratio G / T required at the terminal.
    In a fourth step 204, the particular characteristics of the terminals to be deployed are evaluated to satisfy the link budget. Such characteristics may include in particular the type of antenna or the type of amplifier embedded in the terminal. In addition, additional signal processing features may be incorporated into the terminals of the system to combat atmospheric attenuations of the signal.
    In a fifth step 205, it is verified that the needs of the operator can be satisfied by taking into account the characteristics of the terminals selected at the end of step 204 and taking into account the attenuation ranges of the signal based on elevation ranges of the different terminals.
    If the needs of the connections 200 can not be satisfied, a negotiation is established with the operator to reduce the requirements in terms of quality of service or throughput.
    If, on the other hand, the needs of the connections 200 are satisfied, then the requirements for establishing communications between the terminals and the satellites are validated and a step is passed via a step 206 towards a radio resource allocation process. Step 206 consists of listing, for each terminal of the system, its radio frequency characteristics and the required bit rate.
    Figure 3 details, on a flowchart, the steps of the method of resource allocation according to the invention.
    This method has the global function of dynamic management of radio resources of the system or "dynamic radio resources management" in English. In particular, the allocation of radio resources is realized over time by taking into account the dynamic trajectories of non-geostationary satellites.
    The method starts at step 206 which analyzes the number, type, location, radio frequency characteristics and the required bit rate of each of the terminals of the system determined after the design method described in FIG. 2.
    In a step 208, the radio resources available for each terminal are identified. In other words, the satellites of the system constellation which are in the line of sight of each terminal and which respect a determined separation angle threshold, for each terminal, via the step 207 described in more detail below. For each satellite, the identification of the radio resources may also include the identification of the frequency carriers that can be used to communicate and the number and type of antennas on board the satellite, in particular the polarization of the antennas. At the end of step 208, a list of satellites and associated radio resources is obtained which can potentially be used by each terminal.
    In a step 209, for each terminal, a sort is made in the list of satellites obtained in order to establish an order of priority for the allocation of radio resources. Priorities are defined from a score assigned to each link, the score being determined in particular according to a link budget calculation that can be provided by step 203 of the design method described in Figure 2.
    In a step 210, a radio resource allocation is then performed for each terminal according to the priority score assigned to step 209.
    Steps 208 and 210 are performed in particular from the operational constraints of the system 301.
    In a step 211, all the active radio links are aggregated from the results of the resource allocation step 210. In other words, all uplinks and downlinks between terminals and satellites are identified in order to have a global view of the active radio links.
    In a step 207, then, for each terminal, a separation angle threshold is determined dynamically, according to the invention, which makes it possible to meet the global requirements in terms of required bit rates while complying with the interference level constraints on the terminals. geostationary satellite communications systems operating on the same frequency bands. This step 207 notably takes as input the characteristics of the constellation of the satellites of the system, in particular the positions of the traveling satellites, but also the regulatory constraints of the level of interference and the characteristics of the geostationary systems that one wishes to preserve.
    The determination of a separation angle threshold to be respected for each terminal notably takes into account an overall level of interference calculation from the first system to the geostationary arc and to the ground stations. Step 207 then provides in step 208, for the next iteration of the method, a separation angle threshold to be respected for each terminal to establish a connection with a satellite, so as to comply with the regulations imposed for the level. global interference.
    The steps 208, 209, 210 are then iterated by eliminating from the list of available satellites for each terminal, those which do not make it possible to obtain a separation angle greater than or equal to the separation angle threshold. The radio resource allocation step 210 may thus lead to assigning to a terminal satellites other than those chosen initially or at the previous iteration.
    According to a particular aspect of the invention, the links between terminals and satellites can be bidirectional or unidirectional. A terminal may be allowed to communicate with two different satellites on the uplink and on the downlink or on the contrary, the two channels may be linked in a single bidirectional link between a terminal and a satellite.
    If the links between terminals and satellites are bidirectional, then step 207 of the method according to the invention consists of determining a separation angle threshold associated with each terminal.
    If, on the other hand, a terminal can communicate on an uplink with one satellite and on a downlink with another satellite, then step 207 of the method is duplicated to determine a first separation angle threshold applicable to each terminal. for uplinks and a second separation angle threshold applicable to each terminal for downlinks.
    The radio resource allocation method according to the invention described in FIG. 3 can be executed with a given rate or in response to an event of the life of the system, for example the entry or the exit of a terminal.
    FIG. 4 illustrates a first exemplary embodiment, according to the invention, of the method for dynamically determining a separation angle threshold for each terminal, executed in step 207. According to this first example, the links between terminals and satellites of the first communications system are considered bidirectional, ie a terminal communicates with the same satellite on the uplink and on the downlink. In a first step 401, the active terminals of the first communication system are identified as well as the traveling satellites of the first constellation with which they can communicate according to the list established at the end of step 208 of the method of allocation of radio resources described in Figure 3.
    For each active terminal, an initial predefined threshold value to be respected for the separation angle is set. This threshold may be, for example set at a value of 7 °. In a step 402, all the active terminals are then declared candidates for the potential lowering of their separation angle threshold. This declaration can be done, for example, by means of a vector or a table in which are listed the active terminals identified by a numerical identifier and a binary information indicating whether the terminal is a candidate or not at the potential lowering its separation angle threshold.
    In a step 403, each terminal of the first system is associated with a satellite of the first constellation which complies with the separation angle threshold set in the preceding step and which corresponds to the separation angle closest to the threshold. At the end of step 403, therefore, for each terminal, an associated satellite is obtained so that the link between this terminal and this satellite respects the separation angle threshold while minimizing the value of the angle of separation. separation. In certain cases, no satellite can be retained because no satellite makes it possible to respect the threshold of initial separation angle fixed. This scenario is treated in an alternative embodiment of the invention described below.
    The method then continues with steps 404 and 405 in which a worst-case global interference level calculation is performed. The notion of "worst-case" calculation consists in carrying out this calculation for a minimum separation angle, identified in the previous step 403, the closest to the threshold considered for each terminal. According to the first exemplary embodiment of the method for determining a separation angle threshold described in FIG. 4, a first worst case overall interference level calculation for the uplinks between terminals and satellites of the first communication system is performed in step 404 and a second global worst-case interference level calculation for the downlinks between satellites and terminals of the first communication system is performed at step 405. The first and the second level calculation of Interferences are performed by aggregating the interference level contributions for each active terminal (for the uplink) or for each active satellite (for the downlink).
    The first interference level calculation concerns the interference generated by the transmissions of active terminals to space on the satellites of the geostationary arc. This is interference of the type referenced INT_M_1, INT_M_2 in Figure 1.
    The second interference level calculation is the interference generated by Earth-active satellite transmissions on terminals belonging to geostationary satellite communications systems. It is the interference of the type of those referenced INT_D_1, INT_D_2 in FIG.
    The overall level of interference generated can be calculated using an equivalent power flux density ("power flux density") calculation.
    For example, the calculation of equivalent pfd can be done using the method described in ITU-R Recommendation S.1325-3 of the International Telecommunication Union, which is repeated here.
    According to this recommendation, the equivalent pfd epfd is defined as the sum of the pfd produced at a receiving station of a scrambled system (located on the Earth's surface or in orbit, as the case may be) by all transmitting stations of an interfering system, taking into account the off-axis discrimination of a reference receiving antenna that is assumed to be pointing towards its nominal direction.
    In this case, the interfering system is the first rolling satellite communications system and the scrambled system is a geostationary satellite communications system.
    FIG. 5a represents, in a diagram, a terminal TER NGSO and two satellites SAT_NGS01, SAT_NGS02 of the first communications system as well as a terminal TER_GSO and a satellite SAT_GSO of a geostationary system. The following paragraph gives an example of a calculation 404 of the epfd_up equivalent pfd calculated for the interference produced by transmissions from TER_NGSO to the SAT_GSO satellite of the geostationary system.
    For each geostationary arc position, the epfd_up equivalent pfd for the uplinks (first interference level calculation 404) can be calculated through the following relationship (1):
    (1) where:
    Na is the number of terminals of the first communication system visible from a geostationary satellite (in FIG. 5a, only one terminal TER_NGSO is shown) i is the index of the terminal considered belonging to the first communication system,
    Pi is the RF power input of the antenna of the terminal TER_NGSO considered belonging to the first communication system (dBW),
    G ( <pu) is the gain of the transmitting antenna of the terminal TER_NGSO considered belonging to the first communication system towards a geostationary satellite SAT_GSO,
    Gr (p2,) e8t the gain of the receiving antenna of a geostationary satellite SAT_GSO in the direction of the ith terminal of the first communication system TER_NGSO,
    Grtmx is the maximum gain of the antenna of a geostationary satellite SAT_GSO, (pu is the angle between the line of sight of the terminal TER_NGSO considered (index i) belonging to the first communication system and the direction between the terminal TER_NGSO and a geostationary satellite SAT_GSO (angle represented in FIG. 5a), q> 2i is the angle between the line of sight of a geostationary satellite SAT_GSO and the direction between this satellite SAT_GSO and the ith terminal TER_NGSO considered of the first communication system (angle shown in Figure 5a),
    Ri is the distance between the terminal TER_NGSO considered of the first communication system and the geostationary satellite SAT_GSO.
    The calculation of the epfd_up equivalent pfd for uplinks is performed for all points in the geostationary arc with appropriate sampling. The pointing direction of the geostationary satellite SAT_GSO, ie the value of the angle 92, is chosen so as to maximize the value of the interference level epfd_up. The pointing direction of the terminal of the first TER_NGSO system, ie the value of the angle <pij, is given by the direction between this terminal TER_NGSO and the satellite SAT_NGSO selected in step 403 (satellite which makes it possible to minimize the angle of separation).
    The value of the separation angle threshold has an influence on both the angle tpi, and the angle φ2, since this value defines the relative distance of the moving satellite SAT_NGSO from the geostationary satellite SAT_GSO. Consequently, the value of the separation angle threshold has an influence on the gain of the receiving antenna of a geostationary satellite SAT_GSO in the aiming direction of the terminal TER_NGSO of the first system and on the gain of the antenna of transmitting the TER_NGSO terminal of the first system in the aiming direction of the geostationary satellite SAT_GSO.
    FIG. 5b represents, in a diagram, two terminals TER_NGS01, TER_NGS02 and a satellite SAT_NGSO of the first communications system as well as a terminal TER_GSO and a satellite SAT_GSO of a geostationary system. The following paragraph explains a calculation example 405 of the epfd_down equivalent pfd calculated for the interference produced by the SAT_NGSO satellite transmissions to the TER_GSO terminal of the geostationary system.
    Similarly, for each terminal TER_GSO placed on a point on the earth's surface, the epfd_down equivalent pfd for the downlinks (second interference level computation 405) can be calculated via the relation ( 2), identical to relation (1) but applied to the following variables:
    (2)
    Nb is the number of satellites of the first constellation visible from a terminal belonging to the geostationary system (in FIG. 5b, a purely satellite SAT_NGSO is represented, purely illustrative), P ', is the RF power input of the antenna of the satellite SAT_NGSO considered belonging to the first constellation (dBW),
    G (φ ι) is the gain of the transmitting antenna of the satellite SAT_NGSO considered belonging to the first constellation towards a terminal TER_GSO belonging to the geostationary system, G ( <p'2i) is the gain of the receiving antenna of a terminal TER_GSO belonging to the geostationary system towards the ith satellite SAT_NGSO considered of the first constellation, G'rmax is the maximum gain of the antenna of a terminal TER_GSO the geostationary system, <p'ii is the angle between the line of sight of the satellite SAT_NGSO considered (index i) belonging to the first constellation and the direction between this satellite SAT_NGSO and a terminal TER_GSO belonging to the geostationary system (angle shown in Figure 5b) , φ'21 is the angle between the line of sight of a terminal TER_GSO belonging to the geostationary system and the direction between this terminal TER_GSO and the ith satellite SAT_NGSO considered of the first constellation (angle shown in Figure 5b), R i is the distance between the satellite SAT_NGSO considered of the first constellation and the terminal TER_GSO of the geostationary system.
    Relation (2) is applied for a set of assumed terminal positions of a geostationary system according to a predefined and appropriate mesh of the Earth's surface. The pointing direction of the terminal TER_GSO belonging to the geostationary system, in other words the value of the angle φ'2ΐ is chosen so as to maximize the value of the level of interference epfd_down. The direction of pointing of the satellite SAT_NGSO, in other words the value of the angle φ'ϋ, is the pointing direction of the satellite SAT_NGSO selected at the step 403 (satellite which makes it possible to minimize the angle of separation) towards the terminal TER_NGSO considered.
    The value of the separation angle threshold has an influence on both the angle φ'-π and the angle φ'2ι since this value defines the relative distance of the moving satellite SATJMGSO from the geostationary satellite SAT_GSO. Consequently, the value of the separation angle threshold has an influence on the gain of the receiving antenna of a terminal TER_GSO belonging to the geostationary system in the direction of view of the satellite SAT_NGSO of the first system and on the gain of the SAT_NGSO satellite transmit antenna of the first system in the aiming direction of the terminal TER_GSO.
    The method continues with the application of a step 406 consisting of a conformity test of the interference levels calculated in steps 404 and 405 with limits specified by regulation, for example by the International Telecommunication Union.
    In step 406, a first uplink compliance test is applied comparing the first level of global interference Epfd_up with a first regulatory limit. Similarly, a second downlink compliance test is applied comparing the second level of overall Epfd_down interference with a second regulatory limit.
    The compliance tests of step 406 may more generally consist of evaluating whether the first level of global interference Epfd_up and the second level of global interference Epfd_down are acceptable or not from the point of view of the operation of geostationary systems.
    If the two compliance tests performed at step 406 are compliant, that is, if the two global interference levels are each less than the regulatory limits on the entire geostationary arc and for all terminal position assumptions of a system geostationary, then the method continues with a step 407 which consists in decreasing, by a predetermined value, the value of the separation angle threshold for each terminal that is candidate for lowering its threshold. Following step 407, the method restarts at step 403 for a new iteration. The lowering of the separation angle threshold is possible here because the overall level of interference generated by setting the separation angle threshold to the initial value set at the first step 401 does not exceed the regulatory limits.
    If, on the other hand, one of the two conformance tests performed in step 406 is not compliant, the method continues with steps 408 and / or 409.
    If the first uplink conformance test is not compliant, ie if the first level of global interference Epfd_up is greater than the first threshold for at least one point in the geostationary arc, the method continues with a step 408 which consists in identifying the geostationary satellites, in other words the points of the geostationary arc, which are subjected to a non-compliant level of interference.
    If the second downlink compliance test is not compliant, that is, if the second global interference level Epfd_down is greater than the second regulatory threshold for at least one assumed position of a terminal of a geostationary system , the method continues with a step 409 which consists in identifying the terminals of the geostationary systems, in other words the points of the mesh of the Earth, which undergo a level of non-compliant interference.
    The method continues with step 410 in which, for each nonconformity identified, the pairs (terminal, satellite) of the first system (as created at the end of step 403) are identified whose contribution, in the overall interference calculation, is the highest. This search is performed independently for the calculation of the interference level associated with the epfd_up uplinks and for the interference level calculation associated with the epfd_down downlinks. This search can be done by evaluating separately the terms of the sums involved in relations (1) and (2), ie the interference levels calculated for each of the Na terminals (for uplinks) or each of the Nb satellites (for downlinks) and looking for pairs (terminal, satellite) that produce the highest level of interference for each of the two conformance tests. At the end of step 410, we thus obtain a list of terminals of the first system that have a separation angle threshold that generates a level of non-regulatory interference on geostationary systems.
    In a step 411, for each terminal of the list identified in step 410, the value of the separation angle threshold is restored to the value fixed at the previous iteration, and then the terminal is removed from the list of candidate terminals to lowering their separation angle threshold.
    In a step 412, it is checked whether the list of the terminals candidates for the lowering of their separation angle threshold is empty, if yes we go to step 413 which consists in updating, for each terminal, the value from the separation angle threshold to the last fixed value.
    If this list 412 is not empty, then the method returns to step 403 for a new iteration.
    According to a variant of the first embodiment of the invention as described in FIG. 4, step 411 is modified to take into account situations where, when a separation angle threshold is reestablished at its value at the previous iteration, we arrive at a situation where the terminal considered can no longer communicate with any satellite without breaking this threshold. In other words, no satellite is compatible with the value of the separation angle threshold for the terminal in question.
    To take this possibility into account, step 411 is modified as follows. For each terminal of the list identified in step 410, the value of the separation angle threshold is restored to the value fixed at the previous iteration if at least one satellite is accessible, for this terminal, with the old value .
    In the opposite case, the value of the separation angle threshold is maintained and the overall interference level of the system is lowered by adapting the RF characteristics of the links involving the terminal and a satellite of the system. The adaptation may concern the power density of the signal transmitted by the terminal (uplink) or the signal transmitted by the satellite (downlink). The adaptation may also concern the type of satellite antenna and / or the frequency of the signals exchanged and / or the polarization of these signals. Step 411 ends in all cases by removing the terminal from the list of terminals that are candidates for lowering their separation angle threshold.
    In a second embodiment, according to the invention, of the method for dynamically determining a separation angle threshold for each terminal, executed in step 207, the uplinks and the downlinks are considered independent. In other words, the same terminal can communicate with a first satellite on an uplink and with a second satellite on a downlink. In this second example, a first separation angle threshold for the uplinks and a second separation angle threshold for the downlinks are considered separately.
    The method described in Figure 4 is then applied independently for uplinks and for downlinks. The steps of the method according to the second embodiment applied to the uplinks in FIG. 6 are shown and applied to the downlinks in FIG.
    The method described in Figure 6 for uplink unidirectional links is identical to that described in Figure 4 for bidirectional links except that steps 405 and 409, which concern the calculation of interference generated by the downlinks , are deleted.
    The method described in FIG. 7 for the unidirectional downlink links is identical to that described in FIG. 4 for the bidirectional links except that the steps 404 and 408, which concern the calculation of interference generated by the uplinks. , are deleted.
    The two embodiments of the method, according to the invention, of dynamic determination of a separation angle threshold as described in support of the algorithm of FIG. 4 are given for illustrative purposes. Without departing from the scope of the invention, the method can be implemented through other implementations. In particular, the iterative processing described in Figure 4 can be replaced by an algorithm consisting of calculating the global interference levels Epfd_up, Epfd_down for several separation angle thresholds, taken in a range of variation. For example, global interference levels can be calculated for separation angle thresholds ranging from 2 ° to 7 ° in steps of 0.5 °. The set of calculation results is saved in memory and a parametric optimization is performed to determine, for each active terminal, the separation angle threshold which makes it possible to obtain the lowest overall interference level or which allows obtain an overall interference level that meets the regulatory threshold.
    权利要求:
    Claims (20)
    [1" id="c-fr-0001]
    A method of allocating radio resources for establishing satellite communications in a first communications system comprising a constellation of traveling satellites (SAT_NGS01, SAT_NGS02) and a first set of terminals (TER_NGS01, TER_NGS02), the method comprising following steps, for each terminal (TER_NGS01, TER_NGS02) of the first set: - determining (207) a distinct separation angle threshold to be satisfied with respect to a geostationary satellite constellation (SAT_GSO), an angle of separation being defined as the weakest topocentric angle under which a passing satellite (SAT_NGS01, SAT_NGS02) and any geostationary satellite (SAT_GSO) of the geostationary arc are seen from a given terminal (TER_NGS01, TER_NGS02) of the first set, to authorize (210) the terminal (TER_NGS01, TER_NGS02) to establish a communication link with a moving satellite (SAT_NGS01, SAT_NGS02) if the separation angle (ati1, at22) associated with said link is greater than or equal to the separation angle threshold.
    [2" id="c-fr-0002]
    The method for allocating radio resources for the establishment of satellite communications according to claim 1, wherein the distinct separation angle threshold to be respected for each terminal (TER_NGS01, TER_NGS02) of the first set is determined so as to the set of authorized communications links (210) generates, on a geostationary satellite communications system, an interfering power level conforming to a regulatory limit.
    [3" id="c-fr-0003]
    A method for allocating radio resources for establishing satellite communications according to one of the preceding claims, wherein determining (207) a separation angle threshold comprises: - the calculation (404,505) of at least one interfering power level generated by all the communications links between the terminals (TER_NGS01, TER_NGS02) of the first set and the traveling satellites (SAT_NGS01, SAT_NGS02) to a geostationary satellite communications system, - the iterative search ( 406,407,408,409,410,411,412), for each terminal (TER_NGS01, TER_NGS02) of the first set, the minimum value of the separation angle threshold for maintaining said at least one calculated interfering power level complies with a regulatory limit.
    [4" id="c-fr-0004]
    The method of allocating radio resources for establishing satellite communications according to claim 3 wherein determining (207) a separation angle threshold comprises an initialization phase (401, 402) of assigning ( 401) an initial value at the separation angle threshold, for each terminal, and declaring (402) each terminal candidate for lowering its separation angle threshold.
    [5" id="c-fr-0005]
    5. A method for allocating radio resources for establishing satellite communications according to claim 4, wherein said iterative search comprises, for each terminal and at each iteration, the association (403) of said terminal with a traveling satellite respecting the separation angle threshold determined at the current iteration and for which the separation angle is closest to said threshold, the iterations being continued as long as at least one terminal is candidate for the lowering of its angle threshold of seperation.
    [6" id="c-fr-0006]
    The method for allocating radio resources for the establishment of satellite communications according to claim 5 wherein the communication links between the terminals (TER_NGS01, TER_NGS02) of the first set and the traveling satellites (SAT_NGS01, SAT_NGS02) are bidirectional or one-way upstream and said iterative search comprises calculating (404) a first interfering power level generated by the set of up-link communications to the geostationary arc for a set of assumed positions of geostationary satellites.
    [7" id="c-fr-0007]
    The radio resource allocation method for the establishment of satellite communications according to claim 6 wherein calculating (404) said first interfering power level is determined by selecting, for each geostationary satellite, a pointing direction that allows to maximize the value of said first interfering power level.
    [8" id="c-fr-0008]
    8. method for allocating radio resources for establishing satellite communications according to one of claims 6 or 7 wherein said iterative search comprises the search (408) of at least one geostationary satellite for which the first level of interfering power calculated does not comply with the said regulatory limit.
    [9" id="c-fr-0009]
    9. method for allocating radio resources for the establishment of satellite communications according to claim 5 wherein the communication links between the terminals (TER_NGS01, TER_NGS02) of the first set and the traveling satellites (SAT_NGS01, SAT_NGS02) are unidirectional downward and said iterative search comprises computing (405) a second interfering power level generated by the set of downlink communication links to a set of assumed terminal positions (TER_GSO) belonging to a geostationary satellite communications system.
    [10" id="c-fr-0010]
    10. Method for allocating satellite communication resources according to one of claims 6 to 8 wherein the communication links between the terminals (TER_NGS01, TER_NGS02) of the first set and the traveling satellites (SAT_NGS01, SAT_NGS02) are bidirectional and said iterative search comprises computing (405) a second interfering power level generated by the set of downlink communication links to a set of assumed terminal positions (TER_GSO) belonging to a geostationary satellite communications system.
    [11" id="c-fr-0011]
    11. method for allocating radio resources for the establishment of satellite communications according to one of claims 9 or 10 wherein the calculation (405) of said second interfering power level is determined by choosing, for each terminal (TER_GSO) belonging to a geostationary satellite communications system, a pointing direction that maximizes the value of said second interfering power level.
    [12" id="c-fr-0012]
    The method for allocating radio resources for the establishment of satellite communications according to one of claims 9 to 11 wherein said iterative search comprises searching (409) at least one terminal belonging to a communications system by geostationary satellites for which the second level of interfering power calculated does not comply with said regulatory threshold.
    [13" id="c-fr-0013]
    13. Method for allocating radio resources for the establishment of satellite communications according to one of claims 8 to 12 wherein said iterative search comprises, for each first or second level of interfering power calculated not in accordance with said regulatory threshold, the searching (410) for at least one pair (terminal of the first set, moving satellite) whose contribution in the value of the first or second interfering power level is the highest.
    [14" id="c-fr-0014]
    14. A method for allocating radio resources for establishing satellite communications according to claim 13, wherein said iterative search comprises, for each terminal of the couple (terminal of the first set, scrolling satellite) selected, the restoration (411) of the separation angle threshold determined at the previous iteration and removing said terminal from the list of candidates for lowering the separation angle threshold.
    [15" id="c-fr-0015]
    15. A method for allocating radio resources for the establishment of satellite communications according to claim 13 wherein said iterative search comprises, for at least one terminal of the couple (terminal of the first set, scrolling satellite) selected, the adaptation of RF characteristics of at least one link involving said terminal and a traveling satellite, so as to decrease the interfering power level of all the authorized communications links (210) on a geostationary satellite communications system.
    [16" id="c-fr-0016]
    16. A method of allocating radio resources for establishing satellite communications according to one of claims 6 to 15 wherein the iterative search comprises a check (406) of the conformity of the first interfering power level and / or the second interfering power level and, if compliance is verified, lowering (407) the separation angle threshold by a predetermined value, for each terminal candidate to lower its separation angle threshold.
    [17" id="c-fr-0017]
    17. Method for allocating radio resources for the establishment of satellite communications according to one of claims 4 to 16 wherein the iterative search is stopped when no terminal is no longer a candidate for lowering its threshold. separation angle.
    [18" id="c-fr-0018]
    18. A radio resource allocation device for establishing satellite communications comprising means, including at least one processor and a memory, configured to implement the radio resource allocation method according to one of the preceding claims. .
    [19" id="c-fr-0019]
    A computer program comprising instructions for executing the radio resource allocation method for establishing satellite communications according to any one of claims 1 to 17, when the program is executed by a processor.
    [20" id="c-fr-0020]
    A processor-readable recording medium on which is recorded a program including instructions for executing the method for allocating radio resources for establishing satellite communications according to any one of claims 1 to 17. , when the program is executed by a processor.
    类似技术:
    公开号 | 公开日 | 专利标题
    EP3182615B1|2020-07-15|Method for allocating radio resources in a communication system by moving satellites with constraints on the level of interferences towards a geostationary system
    EP2008376B1|2010-08-11|Method and device for communication on a communication link between an aircraft and a ground station
    US10999309B2|2021-05-04|Systems and methods for distributed P25 LMR radio vulnerability management and real-time interference monitoring
    Nguyen-Thanh et al.2013|A cluster-based selective cooperative spectrum sensing scheme in cognitive radio
    EP2747328B1|2021-02-24|Method for jamming communications in an open-loop controlled network
    Ho-Van et al.2020|Security performance of underlay cognitive relaying networks with energy harvesting
    EP2275903B1|2012-10-03|Method and apparatus for dynamic power consumption management of a processor
    EP2654222B1|2015-06-10|Method for testing an amplification channel of a repeater of a telecommunications satellite
    CA2674754C|2017-06-13|Process for reducing transmission collisions in a tdma slot for data links
    Arokkiaraj et al.2014|OFDM based spectrum sensing in time varying channel
    WO2018091811A1|2018-05-24|Method for allocating resources in an access network, corresponding base station, computer program product and data medium
    FR3072232B1|2019-09-20|INTERFERENCE REDUCTION METHOD
    Chen2015|Overcoming SATCOM Disruption, From RF Interference To Rain Fade
    EP3241393B1|2020-05-20|Method and system for managing radio resources in a mobile communication network
    EP3506703B1|2020-07-15|Method for allocating radio resources in a wireless network, by learning
    EP3723318B1|2022-02-09|Method and device for controlling a data transmission mode used by a vehicle for communicating
    EP3422599B1|2021-09-22|Communication device for processing interferences between signals transmitted in neighbouring emission spots, associated method
    US11109241B1|2021-08-31|Systems and methods for improving wireless network coverage
    EP3672105A1|2020-06-24|Method for non-orthogonal multiple access for satellite transmission
    Prasain et al.2015|Nullifying malicious users for cooperative spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks using outlier detection methods
    RU2457538C1|2012-07-27|Apparatus for technical monitoring of digital signals
    FR3099673A1|2021-02-05|PROCESS FOR DETERMINING THE CONSTRAINTS OF A NON-GEOSTATIONARY SYSTEM WITH RESPECT TO ANOTHER NON-GEOSTATIONARY SYSTEM
    FR3099671A1|2021-02-05|Method for determining the constraints of a non-geostationary system vis-à-vis another non-geostationary system
    FR3087612A1|2020-04-24|COMMUNICATION METHOD BETWEEN IAB NODES IN ALTERNATE BIDIRECTIONAL MODE ALLOWING MULTIPLEXING OF COMMUNICATIONS.
    CN109639342A|2019-04-16|The frequency spectrum sensing method and device of GEO satellite communication system uplink
    同族专利:
    公开号 | 公开日
    EP3182615A1|2017-06-21|
    EP3182615B1|2020-07-15|
    US10390351B2|2019-08-20|
    FR3045989B1|2017-12-29|
    US20170181173A1|2017-06-22|
    CA2952132A1|2017-06-18|
    引用文献:
    公开号 | 申请日 | 公开日 | 申请人 | 专利标题
    US20040110467A1|1999-01-07|2004-06-10|Hughes Electronics Corporation|Method and apparatus for providing wideband services using medium and low earth orbit satellites|
    US6725013B1|2000-06-15|2004-04-20|Hughes Electronics Corporation|Communication system having frequency reuse in non-blocking manner|
    WO2009051907A1|2007-10-18|2009-04-23|O3B Networks Limited|Apparatus and methods for satellite communication|
    US6236834B1|1993-12-15|2001-05-22|International Mobile Satellite Organization|Method and apparatus for limiting interference between satellite systems|
    FR2735304B1|1995-06-12|1997-07-11|Alcatel Espace|SCROLLING SATELLITE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, SATELLITE, STATION AND TERMINAL INCLUDED|
    US6011951A|1997-08-22|2000-01-04|Teledesic Llc|Technique for sharing radio frequency spectrum in multiple satellite communication systems|
    JP2000310673A|1999-04-26|2000-11-07|Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd|Gps receiver|
    US9585150B2|2015-03-20|2017-02-28|Qualcomm Incorporated|EPFD coverage for NGSO satellites|
    US9538538B2|2015-03-20|2017-01-03|Qualcomm Incorporated|Satellite beam power backoff|FR3099672B1|2019-07-31|2021-06-25|Thales Sa|METHOD OF DETERMINING A MAXIMUM TRANSMIT POWER OF A NON-GEOSTATIONARY SATELLITE|
    WO2021018932A1|2019-07-31|2021-02-04|Thales|Method for determining constraints of a non-geostationary system with respect to another non-geostationary system|
    US10805807B1|2019-12-05|2020-10-13|Loon Llc|Coordination of spectrum allocation and interference avoidance among high-altitude networks|
    FR3099671A1|2020-04-23|2021-02-05|Thales|Method for determining the constraints of a non-geostationary system vis-à-vis another non-geostationary system|
    CN112039575A|2020-08-04|2020-12-04|航天科工空间工程发展有限公司|Method for realizing compatible coexistence of newly-built and existing NGSO constellation communication systems|
    CN113131988B|2021-03-03|2022-02-22|中国科学院国家空间科学中心|Multi-dimensional GSO satellite system compatibility analysis method|
    法律状态:
    2016-11-28| PLFP| Fee payment|Year of fee payment: 2 |
    2017-06-23| PLSC| Publication of the preliminary search report|Effective date: 20170623 |
    2017-11-27| PLFP| Fee payment|Year of fee payment: 3 |
    2019-11-28| PLFP| Fee payment|Year of fee payment: 5 |
    2020-11-25| PLFP| Fee payment|Year of fee payment: 6 |
    优先权:
    申请号 | 申请日 | 专利标题
    FR1502640A|FR3045989B1|2015-12-18|2015-12-18|METHOD OF ALLOCATING RADIO RESOURCES IN A DEFINING SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM WITH INTERFERENCE LEVEL STRESS TO A GEOSTATIONARY SYSTEM|FR1502640A| FR3045989B1|2015-12-18|2015-12-18|METHOD OF ALLOCATING RADIO RESOURCES IN A DEFINING SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM WITH INTERFERENCE LEVEL STRESS TO A GEOSTATIONARY SYSTEM|
    EP16203343.5A| EP3182615B1|2015-12-18|2016-12-12|Method for allocating radio resources in a communication system by moving satellites with constraints on the level of interferences towards a geostationary system|
    US15/377,872| US10390351B2|2015-12-18|2016-12-13|Method for allocating radio resources in a communication system using non-GSO satellites with interference level constraint to a geostationary system|
    CA2952132A| CA2952132A1|2015-12-18|2016-12-16|Method for allocating radio resources in a communication system using non-gso satellites with interference level constraint to a geostationary system|
    [返回顶部]